When I first started working in the area of Sales Force Automation
in 1995, I became acquainted with Goldmine. At the
time, it was practically the only game in town. There were three major players to choose
from, all with similar functions and varying levels of channel support. You either used On
Contact!, Act! or Goldmine (the only one without an exclamation mark after its name!).
The company I was working for at the time had elected to displace
their character-based and broken Brock system (can anyone honestly blame them?) in favor
of a Windows-based contact manager. Goldmine won because it offered some tight integration
with Microsoft tools, and that's when I began to take a vested interest in the tool.
Over the years I have watched Goldmine mature from a good product
with a limited set of functions and features to a huge product that easily competes with
the big boys of the world (Siebel, anyone?). Now while these added features and functions
are frequently welcomed by end users, there is always a danger of what I call
"functional overkill" -- essentially forcing a product to evolve past its core
competencies in order to compete in the market place. When vendors take this road, they
stand the chance of losing a portion of their client base by overly complicating what is
otherwise a great product.
Goldmine does what the majority of contact and opportunity
management packages do -- no matter what the price range -- they all track contacts,
calendars, sales and notes. The difference is chiefly in presentation and value-added
features. For those who prefer plain intuitive spreadsheet-type interfaces, Goldmine is
your tool. If you are looking for a fancy, colorful, navigation system, this isn't it.
Goldmine is straight-forward in its data presentation which means data entry and searching
is direct and easy. On the other hand, in their desire to be all things to all users, you
can sometimes get lost hopping between screens and the multitude of tabs that abound.
Rather than compare every feature to its competitors, I'd rather
take the high road and concentrate on what I think is different and valuable: